
Moonraker (1979) was the fourth Bond film to feature British actor Moore as the dashing spy. The previous 007 film, The Spy Who Loved Me (1977), concluded with the disclaimer that Bond would return in For Your Eyes Only. However, producer Albert “Cubby” Broccoli opted to make Moonraker next, in the wake of the overwhelming success of George Lucas’ Star Wars, released in 1977. As with the previous 007 movie, Moonraker took very few elements from Ian Fleming’s source text, with the name of the villain being the only notable similarity. The Moonraker of the novel was actually a nuclear missile intended for Britain’s defense, not a space shuttle.

Moonraker is my least favorite of the Bond series. The film does include some exciting sequences, such as 007’s pre-credits drop from a plane (sans parachute, leaving the spy with no other choice than to steal one from a skydiving villain) and a thrilling chase on the water with Bond piloting a weaponized boat. But the film’s third act, taking place aboard a space station, is both trite and derivative. When Bond and Holly slip onto a shuttle’s prearranged flight, the launch and corresponding navigation to the station is lethargically paced with loud, accompanying music, much too similar to Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). A battle in space resembles Star Wars (mostly with firing lasers, both sight and sound), and one can’t help but associate the emotionless, baritone-voiced Drax with Darth Vader of Star Wars, or the lanky, rarely-speaking Jaws with Chewbacca (Jaws, who never uttered a word in The Spy Who Loved Me, speaks his solitary line near the end of Moonraker). To gain entry into the lab in Venice, a five-digit code must be inputted, which Bond discerns by the keys’ sounds. The five notes were taken (with permission) from Steven Spielberg’s popular 1977 sci-fi film, Close Encounters of the Third Kind. It’s less of an homage and more of another attempt to link Moonraker with the recently successful films of the science fiction genre.

It’s abundantly clear that Moonraker focused most of its energy (and budget, reputedly more than double the budget for The Spy Who Loved Me) on the sequences in space. Sadly, the characters suffered as a result. Hugo Drax is a one-dimensional antagonist, and although French actor Lonsdale is an accomplished performer (with an impressive filmography), he plays it straight and flat and comes across as bland. Likewise, Holly Goodhead is a drab Bond Girl, and actress Chiles typically sounds as if she’s going through a line reading, with little to no inflection in her voice. Supporting players, such as Drax’ bodyguard, Chang (Toshiro Suga), and Bond’s contact in Rio de Janeiro, Manuela (Emily Bolton), are of diminutive value. Chang is overshadowed by Jaws, and Manuela, after being attacked by the metal-teethed henchman (she’s standing outside a warehouse, waiting on Bond), is sent away to “rest” and is never seen again within the movie’s timeline.

Despite its apparent flaws, the producers’ decision to jump on the sci-fi bandwagon was lucrative, as Moonraker became one of the top ten grossing films domestically and earned over 200 million in worldwide gross. It remained the highest grossing Bond film until GoldenEye in 1995. The film was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Visual Effects, losing to Ridley Scott’s Alien.
What does everyone think of Moonraker? Any fans of the film? Counterpoints to any criticisms? I would love to hear any thoughts.
Bond Is Forever will return next month with Thunderball (1965).